| Understanding infrastructure
Infrastructure has delivered excellent performance for some early
investors in the asset class. In many cases, these were better returns
than investors were entitled to expect for the risk they were taking.
But free rides don’t last forever, so is it time to pass on
infrastructure or does it still have a place in an investor’s
portfolio?
Despite this run of past excess returns, there are good reasons
for investors to continue to use infrastructure. Companies with
appropriately structured ownership of infrastructure, as opposed
to pure infrastructure development and construction companies, can
deliver an investment positioned between listed equities and fixed
interest in the risk/return spectrum. Investors should be rewarded
for risk and, for this level of risk, an appropriate long-term investment
return is about 5% more than CPI. This remains deliverable today;
however, over and above this long-term return expectation, infrastructure
investing has broadly offered, and continues to offer, three attractive
investment characteristics:
- By being different from either bonds or general equities, infrastructure
provides diversification benefits relative to each of them;
- As a real asset, with high visibility of cash flows, infrastructure
can offer increased certainty of returns and a lower risk of capital
loss;
- With revenue generally linked implicitly or explicitly to inflation,
infrastructure can provide some element of natural hedge against
inflation.
Reap the benefits To get these investment benefits,
especially in today’s environment, investors need to focus
upon two issues. The first is to recognize that, in seeking these
benefits, not all infrastructure is equal. There is a broad spectrum
of investment opportunities that could be considered to be infrastructure
and not all will deliver diversification, low risk of capital loss
and an inflation hedge. This type of infrastructure is characterized
by revenue confidence, the clear capability to translate this into
profitability, and the ability to do so for an extended period of
time.
The second issue is prospective return. Today there is an imbalance
between an increasing supply of capital, especially private equity
capital, and the available investment opportunities, especially
for directly held infrastructure. This imbalance has driven prices—in
both the direct and listed markets—to levels that are now,
in many cases, ahead of fundamentals. In the process, investors
have enjoyed excellent rewards but the free ride is probably over.
With an expensive market overall and with the prices of many assets
above intrinsic values, there is still value to be found. The challenge
now in achieving returns equal to, or even better than, long-term
equilibrium expectations for the sector, has become greater and
more of a focus on effective investment selection is required.
By carefully selecting a universe of the infrastructure companies
from the deep pool of global listed infrastructure companies, investors
can get the attractive risk characteristics of ownership infrastructure—diversification,
low risk of capital loss and inflation hedge. By then applying disciplined
bottom-up analysis to identify companies within this infrastructure
universe having intrinsic values ahead of their trading prices,
investors can still get a return equal to, or above, CPI + 5%.
—Ian Smith, portfolio manager, Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure
Fund
For a PDF version of this article, click
here.
|
|