| In
the Know
Global private information in international equity markets*
By Gregory
H. Bauer, Research Adviser, Bank of Canada
If
we think of the many roles of fund managers, one of their primary
activities is to allocate funds across a wide variety of assets.
To do this, they need estimates of both: (i) the expected returns
on the assets; and (ii) the covariance matrix of the assets. The
latter contains both the volatilities of the individual assets and
the correlations between them. Research has shown that both the
volatilities and the correlations are changing over time. They are
thus conditional volatilities and correlations: investors must use
current information to forecast them when making portfolio decisions.
Yet, despite
many years of academic research, identifying the reasons why volatilities
and correlations change over time remains problematic. This is especially
true in international stock markets. Research has shown that identifiable
public news (e.g. new publicly available information about the economies
of the countries or earnings of the individual firms) has very small
effects on the means and variances of international stock returns.
Nevertheless, there is some factor that causes international stock
markets to move together. This missing factor could be based on
rational, but not yet discovered reasons, or perhaps it arises from
irrational trading on the part of global investors.
Superior
knowledge
New academic research is beginning to link traditional theories
of asset prices, such as the well-known Capital Asset Pricing Model
(CAPM), to newer theories based on the microstructure of the markets
that examine how assets are actually traded and who is trading them.
One of the results of this new research is the prominent role of
private information, i.e., how investors are asymmetrically informed
about the prices of assets. Private information means some investors
have superior knowledge of the cash flows or the return on asset
when compared to the average investor. This is not insider information
but comes from interpreting public information in a superior way.
For example,
if a hedge fund manager hires many PhDs and runs a sophisticated
trading model, the manager may gain sophisticated information about
the returns of the stocks being examined. Obviously, such resources
are not available to the average investor and thus the hedge fund
manager has private information when compared to the average investor.
When the hedge fund manager trades stocks based on this model, the
change in the prices of the stocks will (eventually) reveal the
private information to all of the market participants. Private information
cannot stay private forever.
If large investors
who trade international equities have private information about
the prices of stocks from many countries, this could be part of
the missing factor that explains why these stocks move together.
In research with Professor Rui Albuquerque (Boston University) and
Professor Martin Schneider (New York University), I have been exploring
how to extract global private information from the trades of international
investors. Global private information could arise in a number of
way. One example is top-down analysis where hedge fund managers
have proprietary macroeconomic models that give good signals for
the economies of several countries. Global private information could
also arise from a bottom-up analysis where large financial institutions
in aggregate disperse private information from many markets.
Our work shows
that such information is important. We find that two-thirds of all
trades in international equities by U.S. investors are driven by
private information and that half of all these trades are due to
global private information. Thus, one-third of all U.S. transactions
in international equity markets are due to global private information.
While this does not completely explain international stock market
covariation, it does go partway to resolving the puzzle. We are
continuing to work in this area with the hopes of further explaining
this phenomenon.
*The views
in this article are those of the author and do not reflect those
of the Bank of Canada.
To view
Gregory H. Bauer's presentation, click
here.
|