|
Mass Exodus?
When the Department of Finance put an end to the Foreign Property
Rule in early 2005, many in the industry didn’t think plan
sponsors would move their money out of Canada anytime soon. However,
recent research done by the Canadian Pension Fund (CPF) Investment
Directory shows that, when it comes to new mandates awarded between
fall 2004 and fall 2005, Canadian investors have moved away from
domestic standbys such as equities and bonds and poured money into
global products such as EAFE. The research is contained in the CPF’s
most recent Business Activity Report, which looks at the new mandates
and types of mandates being awarded in Canada. It is based on a
survey of 129 money managers with business activities in Canada.
They cover the spectrum of institutional asset management, representing
75% of the market, with $1,777,871.4 million in assets under management.
This table, which focuses on active mandates, shows just how swift
the turn from Canadian equities to global assets has been, particularly
when compared with the same period in 2004, before the elimination
of the Foreign Property Rule. Between 2004 and 2005, actively managed
mandates have seen a good deal of growth in global equity (up to
$1,269.2 billion from $510.2 million) and in relatively “new”
areas such as EAFE, emerging markets, real return bonds, and managed
futures. Meanwhile other management types have decreased. In particular,
there has been a steep drop in the area of Canadian equity, which
sank from just under $3.5 billion in 2004 to just over $1.3 billion
in 2005—a major drop of more than $2 billion. Still another
trend that can be noted from Table 1 is the large growth in the
“Other” category between 2004 and 2005. According to
this survey, $2,003.0 million, or nearly half, of “Other”
mandates relate to currencies and currency management. Again, currency
is playing a major role as Canadian investors look abroad for new
investment opportunities.
—Caroline Cakebread
For a PDF version of this article, click
here.
|
|