|
Editorial
Ian Dew-Becker and Robert Gordon of Northwestern University have
studied wage and salary increases in the U.S. between 1966-2001.
Their study, “Where Did the Productivity Go? Inflation Dynamics
and the Distribution of Income,” shows that during that time,
only the top 10% of American workers enjoyed a growth rate of real
wage and salary income equal to or above the average rate of economy-wide
productivity and growth. While 90% of workers saw their wage or
salary grow 11% during that time, those in the 90th percentile took
advantage of a whopping 121% increase. Moreover, those in the upper
99.99th percentile are now pocketing 617% more.
As well as film and sport stars, Dew-Becker and Gordon point to
the escalating compensation premium of CEOs and other top corporate
officers. It’s not just that the rich are getting richer—they
are doing so at the expense of the overall economy.
When it comes to attracting top talent, the old adage, you get
what you pay for, certainly applies. But shouldn’t there be
a limit? According to Dew-Becker and Gordon, those massive top percentile
salaries represent corporate productivity gains that aren’t
being passed on to consumers in the form of lower prices—and
they’re definitely not being passed on to investors in the
form of dividends or to grow the company and build new business.
Here in Canada, I haven’t come across the same kind of study.
But in this issue of Canadian investment Review, authors
Vijay Jog, PengCheng Zhu and Shantanu Dutta take a close look at
governance at Canadian restricted voting share firms. The
paper, which won this year’s Barclays Global Investors
Canada Research Award, asks some tough questions, including whether
or not there is any evidence of agency costs as proxied by excess
CEO pay. Turns out, that it’s significantly higher at restricted
voting share firms than at firms with different governance structures.
Excess CEO pay takes a bite out of shareholder profit.
That’s definitely food for thought. Here’s hoping
that Canadian companies will choose to spread the wealth a bit and
to reward staff, shareholders and build their businesses.
—Caroline Cakebread
For a PDF version of this article, click
here.
|