| Why
Gold May Not Glitter |
| Gold bullion's traditional importance as a store
of value has been challenged by several fundamental changes in the
financial markets. |
| by Ben Amoako-Adu and Brian
F. Smith |
| |
|
Beyond its use in jewelry, industrial applications and dentistry,
gold has played an important role in the world's economy since the
dawn of civilization. It has been a store of value and a hedge against
a number of risks, including economic downturn, inflation, currency
devaluation and political turmoil. For the last fifteen years, the
role of gold bullion in the financial markets has been seriously
challenged by five developments. First, in Canada's most recent
economic downturn, gold bullion did not prove itself to be a hedge
against recession. Traditionally, it has been argued that it maintains
its value in difficult economic times. Second, central banks around
the world became committed to working towards and maintaining low
inflation. This reduces the inflation risk and the need for gold
as a store of value. Furthermore, gold bullion has experienced a
slight loss in its real value since 1976. Third, a number of derivative
contracts have been developed which can be used to hedge against
a loss in purchasing power and a variety of other financial risks,
such as currency depreciation. Fourth, the fall of communism has
reduced the likelihood of global political conflict. Thus, the need
to hold gold bullion as a hedge against political risks is lessened.
Finally, the establishment of the Euro currency promises to create
a strong global currency that, in addition to the U.S. dollar, offers
central banks an attractive reserve asset as an alternative to gold
bullion. On the positive side, gold bullion offers portfolio risk
reduction benefits to investors since it has only a small positive
correlation with the stock market. In addition, an investment in
gold stocks has provided a much higher return than has gold bullion.
The 1996 CRB Commodity Yearbook highlights how much the demand
for gold is dependent on its investment appeal. World consumption
of gold in jewelry, industrial and dental applications amounted
to 3170 tons in 1996. This demand was met by an estimated 2280 tons
of gold mine production, recycling of 650 tons of gold scrap and
250 net official gold sales. There are estimated to be approximately
100,000 tons of gold that are still in existence that have been
mined over the centuries. Central banks hold 35,000 tons and the
rest is in coins, jewelry and bullion. Thus, if gold lost its place
as a store of value and central banks sold their gold reserves,
gold mine production could close for over 16 years if consumption
stayed at 1996 levels. Furthermore, the sale of coins and gold bullion
from outside central banks would permit mines to close down for
an even longer period. Thus, the role of gold in financial markets
is critical to its valuation.
|
| |
| Bullion and Stocks as Investments |
|
Gold bullion has had a mean annual real return of -0.85% over the
period 1976 to 1997. The overall slightly negative return masks
markedly different performances over two sub-periods. Over the period
1976 to 1984, the average real return for gold bullion was 3.29%
versus -3.71% over the period 1985 to 1997. Thus, while gold bullion
nearly maintained its real value over the 22-year period, there
were extended sub-periods where significant value was lost.
On the other hand, gold stocks have provided investors with a much
higher return than gold bullion. The average real annual return
on gold shocks was 4.56% over the full time period and it was positive
over both sub-periods. The higher return on gold stocks in an environment
of stagnant gold prices is attributable to reductions in operating
cost per ounce of gold mined for Canadian mining companies as well
as favourable stock market conditions given historically low interest
rates. The standard deviation of gold stock returns is also higher
than that of gold bullion. This is because gold company profits
are levered to the price of gold bullion in the presence of significant
fixed operating costs.
|
| |
| Relationship of Gold Stocks
to Bullion |
| There is a close relationship between the price
of gold bullion and gold stock value. Table 2 shows the results of
the regression of gold stock returns on gold bullion returns. The
slope coefficient of this regression *1, is referred to as the gold
beta of the stock. The slope coefficient value of approximately 1.14
for the full time period indicates that a 1% increase in the price
of gold bullion is expected to lead to a 1.14% increase in the price
of gold stocks.1 Table 3 tests how much the return on the TSE300 Index
can explain the variation in gold stock returns. The returns on the
TSE300 Total Return Index also have a significant positive relationship
with gold stock returns. The percentage of variation of gold stock
returns attributable to the change in gold bullion prices and the
market return is 63%. Thus, the two factors explain almost two-thirds
of monthly changes in gold stock prices. |
| |
| Is Gold Bullion a Recession
Hedge? |
|
In periods of recession and depression, it is argued that gold
bullion is a relatively attractive investment. For example, unlike
deposits, there is no concern regarding default by deposit-taking
institution during a period of poor economic performance with a
gold investment. Furthermore, corporate bonds and stocks also tend
to lose value if economic conditions significantly deteriorate.
On the other hand, the value of gold bullion is not directly tied
to the financial performance of corporations.
Proponents of gold bullion often cite the U.S. Great Depression
as a period in which gold maintained its value and thus served as
a hedge against economic decline. However, this was a period in
which the U.S. dollar could be converted to gold bullion at a fixed
price and thus the link between gold and the U.S. dollar was backed
by the U.S. Federal Reserve.
Since the early 1970s, when the price of gold bullion began floating
after the U.S. abandoned its gold standard, Canada has experienced
two recessions. Between the second quarter of 1981 and the fourth
quarter of 1982, Canada's real gross domestic product (GDP) dropped
by 5%. Between the first quarter of 1990 to that of 1991, the real
GDP likewise dropped by 4%. In the 1981-82 recession, the real gold
bullion price increased by 2% but in the 1990-91 recession, real
gold prices fell by 12%. Thus, the more recent experience would
suggest that gold bullion does not provide a good hedge against
the threat of economic downturn.
|
| |
| Is Gold Bullion an Inflation
Hedge? |
|
Figure 1 shows how U.S. inflation has been contained for the last
fifteen years. The declining inflation rate has also been the pattern
in other major economies as central banks around the world have
made concerted efforts to ensure price stability. Thus, to the extent
that investors have confidence in continued efforts by central banks
to restrain inflation, there is less need for an inflation hedge.
As the figure shows, gold bullion prices have declined concurrent
with the reduction in inflation rates.
If gold bullion is to serve as a strong inflation hedge, then as
inflation increases, gold value should also increase. The relationship
between the nominal gold bullion price and inflation on a monthly
basis is shown in Table 4. This table reports the results of ordinary
least squares regression of the nominal return of gold as a function
of the monthly inflation rate. Over the period 1976 to 1997,1 the
coefficient of the inflation rate is positive and statistically
significant at the 5% level. The coefficient of 2.57 indicates that
a 1% increase in inflation is associated with a 2.57% increase in
the nominal price of gold. However, as shown by the adjusted R2,
only 5% of the variation in gold return is explained by changes
in the inflation rate. Furthermore, over the two sub-periods, the
relationship between inflation and the nominal return on gold bullion
is not statistically significant. In summary, the link between nominal
gold returns and inflation is weak and it is significant only over
the long term.
|
| |
| Alternative Methods of
Hedging Financial Risks |
|
Since the 1970s, there has been a proliferation of very liquid
derivative contracts used to hedge financial risks.2 For example,
there has been rapid growth in the volume of U.S. Treasury bond
futures contracts over a period when the gold price has stagnated.
A short position in these futures contracts can be used to offset
the risk of increases in government bond yields. To the extent that
government yields compensate investors for inflation over the holding
period, bond yields are highly correlated with inflation rates.
Therefore, bond futures contracts can be used as a hedge against
decreases in the real value of financial assets associated with
rising inflation. Another financial instrument developed to handle
inflation risk is the real return bond issued by British and Canadian
governments.
It should be noted that derivative contracts have been developed
to hedge other risks that an investment in gold bullion has traditionally
been thought to help mitigate. Foreign exchange futures, forwards
and option contracts are widely used to manage currency risk. Stock
index derivative contracts are important for handling the risk of
decreasing equity prices. Since both currency and stock market risk
are highly correlated with political risk, gold's traditional and
once dominant role as a safe haven in periods of economic and political
turmoil is also being challenged.
The multitude of different derivative contracts now available means
that management of financial risks can be much more carefully tailored
than in the past. Furthermore, the increasing sophistication of
individual investors and their advisors means that the derivative
technology used to manage risk will be more widely adopted and the
role for gold bullion further lessened.
|
| |
| Bullion as a Hedge Against
Global Political Instability |
|
Gold bullion has been viewed as a hedge against global political
instability. It has been argued that gold bullion is a hedge against
social, political or economic crises, as it can be traded worldwide
at any time and its real value holds during such crises.3 For example,
the peak of gold's price at over US$700 per ounce coincided with
the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the taking of American hostages
in 1979 by Iranian militants. These events demonstrated the link
between gold bullion and major political crises.
However, since the breakdown of the USSR and the communist block,
the threat of significant global political conflict has greatly
diminished. The lessening of East/West tensions is mirrored in the
reduction of US military spending as a percentage of GNP. During
the late 1980s, U.S. military spending was approximately 6% of GNP.
By 1994, such expenditures had decreased to about 4% of GNP. Furthermore,
recent political crises such as the Gulf War, Russia's economic
turmoil and Nato's air strikes inYugoslavia have not had as large
an impact as earlier events would have predicted.
|
| |
| Impact of Strong World
Currencies |
|
As part of their reserves, central banks often hold strong global
currencies such as the U.S. dollar rather than gold bullion. One
of the factors behind the slide in gold prices over the past few
years has been the attraction of US dollar denominated securities.
This attractiveness was enhanced because of the significant real
rate of return on government-backed debt securities. In contrast,
the holder of gold bullion received no interest coupons and had
to rely on an uncertain capital gain.
The creation of the Euro promises to establish another strong major
currency in addition to the US dollar. Thus, investors have another
alternative to gold bullion as a reserve asset. For the European
central banks, the Euro eliminates currency risk within the monetary
union and so lessens the need to hold gold bullion as a buffer against
exchange rate risk.
A number of European countries including Switzerland, France and
Germany have announced that, with the inception of the Euro currency,
they will reduce their gold reserves to only 10% of current holdings.
Given that Germany, France and Switzerland collectively hold 23%
of the world's central bank reserves, it is not surprising that
recent announcements from the European governments concerning these
planned gold bullion sales have had a dampening impact on gold prices.
|
| |
| Gold Within a Portfolio |
|
Despite the evidence outlined above that gold may not be attractive
as a single investment, it is possible that gold may offer investor
benefits within a portfolio. Most importantly, gold may reduce overall
portfolio risk. This, of course, depends on the correlation of gold
with the market. As shown in Table 5, gold bullion has a positive
correlation of 0.27 with the market.4 This implies that gold bullion
may substantially reduce portfolio risk. For portfolio diversification
per se, it is worse to hold gold stocks because they have a higher
correlation with the stock market compared to gold bullion. This
is not surprising as gold stocks constitute a significant proportion
of the TSE300 Index.
This paper has summarized how five factors are depressing the price
of gold bullion. The return on gold bullion over the two most recent
recessions in Canada suggests that gold no longer serves as a useful
hedge against recession or depression. Central banks around the
world are committed to working to keep inflation low. This reduces
the inflation threat and as indicated from our empirical results,
gold bullion is not a highly effective inflation hedge.Third, there
are a growing number of financial derivatives that can be used to
hedge risks associated with inflation and currency devaluation.
These are more precise tools than gold for managing financial risks.
Fourth, the fall of communism has reduced the threat of global political
instability. Fifth, the strength of the U.S. dollar and the recently
created Euro currency offer alternative reserve assets to gold bullion
for the world's central banks. However, gold bullion offers portfolio
risk reduction benefits. Furthermore, gold stocks provide much higher
returns than gold bullion.
|
| |
| Endnotes |
|
1. Tufano (1998) finds that the average gold beta of US
and Canadian stocks over the period January 1990 to March 1994 is
approximately 2.0.
2. The Wharton-Chase Derivatives Survey (1995) reports
that over 70 percent of firms use derivatives to hedge commitments.
3. The traditional role of gold as a hedge against global
crises is discussed in greater in Solnik (1991), International Investments,
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Chapter 11.
4. The correlation of gold bullion with the TSE300 Index
may overstate the correlation of gold with equities given the significant
component of the TSE300 in gold stocks.
|
| |
| References |
|
Jaffe, J., 1989, "Gold and Gold Stocks as Investments for
Institutional Portfolios", Financial Analysts Journal, 45,
53-59.
Solnik, B., 1999, International Investments, Second Edition, Reading,
MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
Tufano, P., 1996, "Who Manages Risk? An Empirical Analysis
of Risk Management Practices in the Gold Mining Industry",
Journal of Finance, 51, 1092-1138.
Tufano, P. and J. Serbin, 1998, "The Determinants of Stock
Price Exposure: Financial Engineering and the Gold Mining Industry",
Journal of Finance, 53, 1015-1052.
The Wharton School and the Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., February
1995, Survey of Derivatives Usage Among U.S. Non-Financial Firms,
Executive Summary. Ben Amoako-Adu and Brian F. Smith are professors
of finance, The Mutual Group Financial Services Research Centre,
School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University in
Waterloo.
|
| |
|