DC members mixing TDFs with other assets to their potential detriment: report

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment (1)

Copyright : Hanna Kuprevich // 123RFWhile target-date funds are intended to be used as a singular option in capital accumulation plans, many defined contribution plan members use them in conjunction with other investments, according to research from Morningstar.

The report noted there are potentially more than 10 million DC participants in both TDFs and other plan investments.

“While combining target-date funds with other investments may not seem problematic at first glance, it can diminish (or eliminate) the target-date fund’s potential benefit,” the report said.

The profile of these mixed-investment users suggests they’re more sophisticated than members who’d normally just use the default investment option provided by the plan, but less sophisticated than members that take a self-directed approach and who don’t use TDFs, the report said.

On average, mixed users hold a portfolio comprised of 37 per cent TDFs, 49 per cent equity funds and 13 per cent bond funds. The report suggested that TDFs can appear to be a single investment to less sophisticated members who don’t realize they’re actually multi-asset strategies, prompting them to add other investments to the mix. Yet, in reality TDFs are intended to be standalone.

The report suggested that DC members who want to be more aggressive should select a different vintage of TDF to increase the risk level of the underlying investments, rather than trying to up the risk level of their portfolios by adding other investments.

“For example, if a participant thought the equity allocation in the 2025 target-date fund vintage was too conservative, he or she could select the 2050 vintage to achieve this more-aggressive risk level,” the report said. “While moving along the glide path results in a mismatch between the actual and expected target dates, it keeps the participant entirely in a professionally managed portfolio.”

For participants who aren’t interested in using solely TDFs, plan sponsors should ensure they’re communicating the best options effectively, the report noted.

“Plan sponsors should communicate to participants who are not interested in using the target-date fund in its entirety that they should consider some type of in-plan advice solution, such as advice or managed accounts,” the report said.

Add a Comment

Have your say on this topic! Comments that are thought to be disrespectful or offensive may be removed by our Canadian Investment Review admins. Thanks!

Mark Matsumoto

I think that much of the problem is that group plans are mostly administered by insurance companies. Insurance people aren't trained or licensed to give investment advice. They have call centres where people are licensed but people don't generally get important advice over the phone. The most that insurance reps can do in their training sessions is show people how to navigate their website or give generic information such as the benefits of solar cost averaging. Therefore there is generally a lack of advice available to members of group plans.

Contex Group Inc.